The problem of things

512px-Seurat-Gravelines-Annonciade

take this for inst. This thing
has dimensionality, this thing
has heft but saying what the thing

is, really saying it so you know this thing
as well as I … well, you see? Maybe there’s something
a tint, a tang that realises the whole thing

so you’ll say, ‘Yes exactly.’ Now, no abstract thing
instantiated into a carry-in-your-pocket thing
you’re walking and becoming, as if they’re the same thing.

Thing of beauty, thing that’s useful, useless, nothing but nonetheless thing.


Image: George Seurat, Study for ‘The Channel at Gravelines, Evening‘ Public domain. A bit of silliness on a Sunday afternoon. And for no particular reason (other than I think you’ll like it)  here’s jazz musician Arthur Russell ‎(1951-1992 – he was just 40 years old when he died) with his orchestral composition Tower Of Meaning (1983).

 

2 thoughts on “The problem of things

  1. Here’s the thing, Peter, I see what I see, and I liked what I saw. As the megacorporations that run the internetted world tell us, we are all so fortunate to be special, and not Frank Sinatra/Radiohead creeps, but individual instantiations. 🦄

    Like

Leave a comment